Hunting Write For Us

Hunting produced the smallest candidate pool of any vertical we have crawled and one of the cleanest lists. Forty pages went in and eight came out, and almost nothing was lost to bot protection along the way. What was lost was outdoor travel writing, which uses the vocabulary of hunting without ever covering it.

How this list was built

Four contributor footprints were run against hunting, deer hunting, bow hunting, hunting gear, waterfowl hunting and big game hunting. After publishing platforms, press wires and competitor roundups were stripped out that left 40 candidate domains.

Each one was fetched and read, and 14 passed. A page passes only when it is actually asking for contributions rather than discussing guest posting as a subject.

The 26 failures were 14 off-topic, 7 blocked by bot protection, 4 selling placements and 1 unreachable. Seven blocked out of forty is the lowest rate in this family, and it says something useful about who publishes here.

Twelve of the fourteen cleared Open PageRank 2. Reading each remaining page removed a lake tourism guide, a retailer, a site whose title renders as an unfilled template variable and a general outdoors blog with no hunting vocabulary on the page, leaving 8.

Hunting sites accepting guest posts

Eight publishers, ordered by Open PageRank, with the submission path linked on each. Read the guidelines first: several of these state a word count and a photography requirement that decide the piece before you start it.

The mix is narrower than eight rows suggests. There is a deer biology reference site, two North American titles from the same publisher, a bow hunting title, a women's outdoors magazine and a gear-led blog. What none of them want is a general outdoors article with the word hunting added to it.

Why fourteen candidates were off-topic

Fourteen off-topic failures out of forty is a high ratio for such a small pool, and the pattern behind it is consistent. Outdoor travel and gear blogs use hunting as a keyword: a packing list mentions it, a national park guide mentions it, and the contributor page inherits the vocabulary from the rest of the site.

The page is real and the invitation is real. The site has simply never published anything a hunter would read, and a piece pitched there either gets declined or gets published somewhere its audience will not find it. Two of the sites we dropped here were dropped from our camping and hiking lists for the same reason.

The practical consequence is that a hunting list assembled from search results without opening them will be mostly travel blogs. That is the failure a guest posting service is paid to prevent, and the reason the reject count sits next to the list rather than behind it.

What to send a hunting editor

Hunting editors read for first-hand experience and they can tell within a paragraph whether you have any. A piece about choosing the right broadhead written from product pages will be spotted. A piece about a season where the broadhead choice went wrong will not, because nobody invents that.

Season timing is a real advantage in this vertical. Rut, waterfowl and turkey seasons each have a window when a publisher is short of copy and a window when they have too much, and a pitch that arrives six weeks before the opener is a different email from the same pitch in February.

Keep the affiliate pitch out of it. Several of these publishers run their own gear reviews and will not take a piece built around someone else's links. If the goal is a link, the article has to earn its place first, which is the premise behind editorial link building and the reason our pitch template leads with the article rather than the ask.

What changes when the publisher is one person

Seven blocked pages out of forty is the lowest rate we have measured, and the reason is structural. Hunting sites are run by one or two people on simple hosting, without the enterprise bot protection that fronts a design magazine or a healthcare title. What that tells you about the outreach is more useful than what it tells you about the crawl.

A one-person publisher reads their own email, usually on a phone, usually in the evening. There is no editorial desk to route around and no submissions queue. The reply, when it comes, comes from the person who will publish the piece.

That is why the length data in the card above matters here more than on any other page in this family. An email that would look normal to a magazine's editorial assistant looks like work to someone checking their phone after a day outside.

Seasonality decides when the pitch lands

Hunting publishing runs on a calendar that is not negotiable. Deer season, waterfowl season and turkey season each pull a publisher's attention completely, and the weeks before an opener are when a small site most needs copy it did not have to write itself.

The practical version is simple. Pitch a rut piece in late summer, not in November when the editor is in a stand. Pitch gear maintenance in the closed season, when there is space for it and nothing else to run. A piece that would be declined in October is welcome in July.

This is the same timing argument that makes roofing outreach work in a different month of the year, and we set it out on the roofing list. Seasonal verticals reward a sender with a calendar and punish one sending on a fixed weekly cadence.

Eight sites, and where the rest of the audience is

Eight publishers is a short list even by the standards of this family, and the honest reading is that hunting has a small publishing population rather than a hidden one. Widening the search does not fix it: the extra results are outdoor travel blogs, which is what fourteen of the forty candidates turned out to be.

The nearest adjacent pools are the ones we have already crawled. The camping list and the hiking list share an audience with hunting at the gear end, and a piece about optics or layering will be read by all three.

Past guest posts, the outdoor audience is unusually reachable through forums and gear communities, which is ordinary link building rather than anything specific to this vertical. A brand that publishes its own field testing will be cited by writers who would never have answered a pitch.

Frequently asked questions

Related guides